CONGRATULATIONS!

Well done on your project! Make sure you commend yourself and your team for the tremendous effort you’ve put in through this hackathon- we’re so excited to see the brilliant project you’re about to submit! Before you relax, make sure you’ve gone through the rubric, submission guidelines, and requirements; the hard part is over, and the best is yet to come!

RUBRIC / JUDGING

HackCamp projects will be graded through a peer-judging process through the nwPlus portal app. After submitting your project on Portal, your team will be assigned 4 projects to manually grade through the portal; each team will have to complete their judging requirements for your work to be eligible for prizes.

Peer Judging will occur from 8:10pm - 8:45pm on November 19 prior to prize announcements.

Peer judging should be conducted per a quantitative assignment according to the scaled rubric below.

Title Column 1 Column 2 GRADE 3 GRADE 2 GRADE 1
Category 5 4 3 2 1
Innovation The hack exemplifies initiative and novelty, acting as an ingenious solution/alternative to a need evidenced by facts and data. Multiple methods, features and elements are integrated into the hack to distinguish its functionality. The vision behind the hack demonstrates foresight for the future, rethinking limitations/ barriers to jumpstart improvement and growth. The hack acts as a practical and thorough solution to a viable need. At least one original feature is included in the hack to differentiate it from common versions or previous technologies. The hack exists as a solution or alternative to a need that is partly applicable to current/future society. The features involved in the hack are a combination of past utilized features, albeit each element is integrated together to form a unique whole. The hack applies as a solution or alternative to a scarce need, contributing some value to businesses/organizations/general society. The features of the hack are conventional but contribute to its purpose. The hack does not act as a viable solution or alternative to any given need. The hack lacks features that contribute to its purpose and function.
Design The hack appeals to its user(s) as a navigable and fluid interface, complimented by a design that embodies its purpose/vision. The hacker(s) use thematic design elements (ie. built-in demos, videos, style sheets) to create an experience that is refreshing, engaging and enjoyable. The hack’s design is accessible and inclusive, combining aestheticism, originality, and efficiency to create a polished and curated product. The hack is relatively easy to navigate by the user, featuring a design that is able to convey key aspects of its purpose. Clear effort is demonstrated through the hack’s design in order to appeal, engage and inspire the user through the hack journey. The hack is able to be navigated by the user, albeit with some difficulty. A majority of the design aspects complement the theme of the hack and its purpose. At least one element of the design engages or appeals to the user. The hack is difficult to navigate, or possesses a design that is not relevant to its theme/vision. Some elements may be disorientating and/or disorganized, distracting from the purpose of the project. The hack possesses no design or interface that is able to interact with its user(s).
Creativity The ideation behind the hack presents itself as unexpected, nuanced and unique. Creators of the hack incorporate different perspectives. The core aspects of the project —including its purpose, structure, and function(s)— include original elements that showcase unconventional problem-solving and application. The hack demonstrates creativity through its vision and ambitiously solves a problem that is uncommon. Diversity in background knowledge and perspective stands out from individual designers/developers. The idea behind the hack is conventional, but unique in its execution and presentation. There are a few creative highlights throughout the project that display unique skillsets and/or perspectives. The hack possesses a single idea or method that can be seen as creative/unique - a majority of the project follows conventional methods or design. The hack resembles ordinary and conventional methods and does not exemplify creativity.
Presentation/Pitch The presentation of the project reaches its audience as comprehensive, detailed, and interactive. The creators’ description of the hack brings its viewers on a detailed journey of the innovative process, inclusive of:

Peer Judging 101

We will be doing peer judging which means that each hacker will need to judge 4 other projects and give feedback. As nwPlus places a large focus on feedback and learning, each team will receive a cumulative rating on each rubric category. Please also note that to qualify for the donation, we ask that you complete peer judging.

The deadline for project submission is at 7:30 PM PST.

Here are some steps!

  1. Click 'Submission' on the Sidebar

  2. You will be prompted to log-in with either Google or Github. Logging in with the email you used to apply to the hackathon with!

  3. Then, you should see a form under the 'Submission' tab to set your email that you used to submit your project. This will help us find what project you submitted! Each member on your team needs to do this step!

    When you've done this successfully, your page should look like this!

  4. At 8:10 PM PST we'll turn on Judging and you should see a new tab on the side bar that says 'Judging'. You should be able to see 4 wonderful projects that fellow hackers have built over the course of the hackathon! You can click 'Judge this Submission' to grade their project and provide some written feedback. Please be kind here and provide constructive criticism wherever possible!

  5. As your project is being judged, you should also be able to go back to the Submission tab to see feedback as it rolls in.

<aside> 📢 If you have trouble doing any of the steps above, let an organizer know in Discord Channel!

</aside>